Crowdfund science research. Be a patron of science.
What they do: Experiment is a crowdfunding platform for science research. We transform everyone with a credit card into a modern day patron of science. Researchers from over 150 institutions and universities are using Experiment to fund important seed-stage research.Why it's a big deal: Since 2010, 80% of principal investigators spend most of their time writing grant proposals and 67% are struggling with less funding. "Big science" has become synonymous with "budget cuts" .Experiment empowers people to invest in their futures. By creating a crowdfunding marketplace for science research, Experiment helps scientists break through bureaucratic barriers and lets patrons make financial contributions to meaningful research. With over $1M in funded projects and 9,000 backers, it's clear that people are eager to make a contribution to the research that matters to them. Experiment opens up possibilities for researchers, leading to more possibilities for our future.
The average age in mission control was 26 when we put a man on the moon. Hundreds of thousands of Americans contributed to the effort and a half-billion people watched the first step. Experiment is a crowdfunding startup with a mission to bring that same sense of excitement to the science research each one of us cares about.
The meteor that struck Russia in February showed how the internet changes the way science can be experienced. At least for a moment, the world was united over a single scientific event.
Experiment co-founder Denny Luan believes this can happen much more often. "The Internet provides a nice way to connect with science. It happened with the Curiosity rover. These events are like the 60s when a man landed on the moon," Denny said "Everyday in labs and in the field, there are these big moments when discoveries are made, we want to share that sense of wonder back with anybody."
How Experiment Was Born
Experiment helps donors fund scientists that are left behind by the traditional grant funding model. They have big goals, hoping their platform can one day be used to fund a cure for cancer, alternative energy, and put a man on Mars.
When they began the startup, it
seemed the only thing holding them back was their young age and their non-Silicon Valley cred. To change that, the young scientists-turned-entrepreneur duo Denny Luan and Cindy Wu persistently stalked 500 Startups VC Dave McClure until he invested $25,000.
This determination shines through in everything they do. To get Experiment off the ground they taught themselves how to code, design, and record production quality videos. Their current team has made big improvements to the site, but the first version of Experiment was completely home grown by the founders.
Their efforts gave them validation that Experiment could transform the way science is done, and tap the power of the crowd to fund thousands of compelling projects that don’t fit within the rigid confines of the traditional grant funding model. Denny’s email signature says it all “Not stopping until we fund the cure for cancer, intergalactic photon rocket, and time machine.”
Denny and Cindy met while they were undergrads in David Baker's lab at the University of Washington in Seattle. Cindy had discovered a potential way to create an antibiotic to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, there was no way to get the small amount of funding she needed to run some initial tests. Luckily her professor funneled money from an existing NIH grant to fund her side project.
“Not stopping until we fund the cure for cancer, an intergalactic photon rocket, and a time machine.”- Denny's email signature
"I never would have been able to take the idea forward otherwise, and I was in the unique position of having a professor that could help me. Later, we interviewed 100 scientists and they all told us they had an idea that they had to put on the shelf due to lack of funds so they could definitely use our platform," Cindy said. She later turned down offers from the best Ph.D. programs in the country in order to start Experiment because she knew thats the current funding structure wouldn't allow her to do the kind of science she wanted to do.
Fixing The Way Science Is Funded
Experiment is structured a lot like Kickstarter in that it takes a 5 percent cut of what is raised and the projects only get funded if the goal is met. Experiment is its own scientific experiment, beginning as a place to fund the long tail of research, projects that don't cost that much or require a multi year commitment. The scientists give donors a front row seat to the projects as they unfold by sharing photos, text, and video updates in real-time.
Typically, researchers spend three months a year writing grants, only to have 80 percent of them rejected because they don't fit into the big projects that agencies like the NIH are set up to fund. Helping university researchers is just the start. Cindy and Denny are also building Experiment for the new world of science where innovation can happen at home as well as in the lab.
"Once you think about research and ideas outside of universities, you start to look at citizen science. To do computational biology today, all you need is a fast computer and a PCR machine," Denny said. "Getting beyond traditional research, you start to look at developing countries. It's not just a lack of funding, it's a lack of infrastructure in countries like Africa, Brazil, and India that prevent innovative ideas from getting off the ground. Helping to surface those ideas and get them funded is the long term vision of where we want to take Experiment" Denny added.
For instance, scientists in Tanzania found that they can trap mosquitos by isolating chemicals that cause stinky feet. They couldn't get funding, so they took a grant from The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.They created a device that attracted mosquitoes to it and lowered malaria rates by 4 times.
Donors Get Excited
When Cindy was a kid, she wanted to be a paleontologist. Her mom and dad would take her to museums, but she really wanted to go on digs herself to see the excavation process unfold first hand.
One Experiment donor, who was
keen on donating to a dinosaur project put up by University of Washington paleontologist Christian Sidor, wanted to give her son exactly what Cindy had dreamed about.
Cindy said: "Sidor received an e-mail from a mother asking if she could send her son on the trip. Her son was still very young likely in elementary or middle school. Dr. Sidor obviously could not take a kid on the trip, but he wrote back saying that there may be a chance for her son to be involved with his research in a more hands on way when he was older. The mom made a large donation to the project afterwards."
A few professors are already successfully crowdfunding their own projects. Experiment will open that up to everyone and give donors more options of interesting things to fund. There are thousands of projects that would get a specific group of people as excited as the general public was about the meteor, but they have no way to find them, or participate in the experiences as they happen.
Jose Gomez-Marquez is a professor at MIT who has experienced the pain of grant writing first hand for the do-it-yourself medical devices he makes for the developing world.
"Crowdsourcing science can disrupt the established trends of of prevailing funding targets. It can provide gateways to respond to patients faster than the academic research process as long as it doesn't get hijacked into funding more science for the sake of publishing instead of our quest for impact in everyday people. But like every good experiment, science projects can often fail --- and the backers have to accept those possibilities," Gomez-Marquez said.
What's new about what you're making?
The only current alternative to directly supporting science is giving through large foundations like the Komen Foundation. Like many large publicly funded institutions scientific donations flow through a giant black hole and 95% of donors never see the results that their donations helped produce. It is an impersonal and detached process with little satisfaction for the public.
There is a huge need for direct access to projects and research. Experiment is the platform for the public to donate and then engage with the projects they’re funding, which has never been done before.
What do you understand about your business that other companies in it just don't get?
People don’t give to science research in exchange for tangible trinkets (t-shirts, mugs, keychains – a la Kickstarter). Physical rewards only work in a pre-purchase or prototype crowdfunding model where the goods have value. Many of our competitors (Petridish, Scifund, 16 others) are struggling because they tried to replicate the Kickstarter model. We built Experiment based on the belief that people fundamentally want to support science for the impact.
We know this because we ask every single one of our donors “what do you want” after they give, and they all give the same answer of “I want to see progress, and I want to know my money made an impact”. That is why we are building ways to help researchers communicate with their backers better than ever before.
We also know that it’s important to work directly with universities and foundations to set up the right process for the funds, because those relationships turn into a lot of high quality research projects.
Why did you pick this idea to work on?
Science funding for research today is broken. Traditional funding agencies like the NIH, NSF, and other large grantwriting institutions are unable to support 80% of the research proposals they receive. The number of high-impact, early-stage ideas that go unfunded is tremendous.
There is also nowhere on the web where non-scientist can closely follow science as it evolves. While popular interest in breakthrough events like the Mars rover and the Higgs Boson are showing that people want to be closer to the scientific process, consumption of scientific exploration is limited to news headlines or National Geographic magazine.
We know how the scientific process works, and we know that there are magical stories in the process that can instantly engage people. We are building the community that brings scientists and the public closer together in an experience that they both love.
How do you make money?
We generate revenue through a 5% transaction fee on fully funded projects. To date we’ve raised over $1.1M for projects.
How big can this company be?
The NIH budget is $30 billion and they reject 80% of their applicants - that’s $120 billion in rejected applications. Assuming half of those 42,000 rejected applications are fundable and can produce preliminary data with $25,000, that is a $525M revenue/$26M profit opportunity for only health-related projects (which represent 1/10th of total research in the U.S.)
We can be a billion dollar company.
Who are your competitors?
At this point, the competitor we take seriously is Indiegogo. They recently decided to step into science crowdfunding, but they are also tackling many other crowdfunding areas. They have significantly more resources, and a lot of users, but building a community around the research is really important. We don’t think Indiegogo has succeeded like Kickstarter or Kiva in this regard. Our goal is to showcase the stories behind these projects one by one and create the community that scientists and donors want.
How do you acquire new projects?
We have two primary acquisition channels, one is direct contact with universities and professors, the other is organic word-of-mouth growth. 12% of the professors and researchers that we contact eventually launch a campaign on Experiment. We also approach researchers from the top down by forming relationships with universities and deans directly. Several deans of research have approved the use of Experiment by their faculty and students, which instantly results in dozens of new projects. The final way we acquire projects is from word-of-mouth within university departments and among the greater public. Funding the future of scientific advancement is exciting for many of our users and they spread the word faster and further than we ever could.
525 researchers have launched projects so far on Experiment, and we still have dozens of other potential acquisition channels.
How do you acquire backers?
The best way for us to bring on users is to acquire more projects. Every new researcher solicits their own community for funding, which results in ~100 new users and 10,000 - 30,000 new pageviews per campaign. Ten new projects may equal 1,000 new backers. And 8% of our backers become repeat backers. So the more projects we gather, the more users we retain until growth becomes entirely organic.
What keeps you up at night? What's your biggest risk?
Not moving fast enough. Worst of all is potentially missing out on a research project that could have a massive impact.
What has been hardest for you to figure out thusfar?
Learning to communicate effectively with large bureaucratic institutions like universities has been the most difficult.
Why do you think the requests rejected by the NIH actually deserve funding?
This question comes from the fact that in the last year, NIH rejected 82% of the proposals they received, which means they rejected over 49,000 grant proposals. This graph shows how this number of overall rejections is only going up.
This message here, however, isn’t that funding model is inefficient, because there are many checks and balances in the current funding model that serve a defined purpose to ensure quality of research. The peer review process and rigorous application cycle of an NIH R01 is incredibly important for filtering promising proposals that are ready for the next phase.
Rather, the real problem here is a reflection of the ever-increasing competition for an ever-decreasing pool of available funds. A recent NSF survey shows the increasing number of graduate level scientists who are entering the research system, while funding agency acceptance rates remain at near record lows. While we are able to identify the top 10 researchers in a field to fund at any given time, the funds available can now only support the top 8, and the pool of exceptional candidates has grown to 20. This is a story that we’ve also heard repeated from non-profit foundations and grant-writing institutions.
What is the biggest challenge you face right now?
It has become easy for us to acquire new projects, but the hardest part is ensuring those projects succeed by educating researchers on how to market their projects effectively. Scientists are excellent at researching and pushing humanity forward, but have less experience selling their ideas and marketing them to the larger public. New researchers have access to an online community where they can learn best practices from researchers who have run campaigns in the past which in some cases has led to deeper collaboration. We are also building an online education guide to make it even easier for researchers to learn how to market their campaigns.
What will Experiment look like in 10 Years?
Magic School Bus + Bill Nye the Science Guy + NOVA special + National Geographic = Experiment
What is the long term vision for Experiment?
The bigger opportunity is not just fixing a broken system, but changing the definition of viable research from the current institutional approach to one where anyone with the right question, background, and audience can raise funds to do their research. Our quantum leap will be when we broaden the definition of where science is done beyond universities and institutions. Experiment will be the funding portal for institutional projects, but also a platform enabling everyone to pose scientific questions and raise money to find the answers.
Experiment is conducting a Regulation D offering via Wefunder Advisors LLC. CRD Number: #167803.
After six months of studying the literature to develop a nutritional system, Tibbetts and Licina (along with 5 other experimenters) put their protocol to the test—on themselves. They also orchestrated a successful crowdfunding campaign, necessary to buy the vitamin A2, which costs about $1,000 for a fingernail-sized drop of oil. The experimenters took 1.6 milligrams of oil every day, about $25. “We realized that our allowance money and pocket change weren’t gong to cut it,” Licina said.
Though it is hard, as the price of DNA sequencing has plummeted, to believe that there is any important group of organisms which has not had the genome of at least one representative species scrutinised, Kathleen Pryer of Duke University, in North Carolina, claims this is true of ferns. She proposes to correct that by looking at an unusual member of the group, using money raised on experiment.com, a crowdfunding site that exists to support scientific research.
So after tapping traditional funding help from UC and other sources, Piel and Fiona Stewart, his wife and collaborator, recently decided to try their luck on the Internet. They posted a description of their project and an appeal to the public for money on Experiment, an online crowdfunding site devoted to science.
Facing a stark federal budget to support scientific research, Hiller and other scientists have begun experimenting with crowdfunding their research. It is scientific funding for the social media age, with pitches made in brief videos, funders often kept updated on results through blogs, and the normally secretive “peer review” process used to vet proposals taking place in public as funders decide whether to contribute.
Chubak is trying to raise $4,000 on the web site "Microryza," developed by two University of Washington researchers who themselves were seeking funding for their projects. The money will supplement the grant she's already received, allowing her to interview more families and do a pilot program at more than one location.
“We’re building all these profiles of scientists, and the scientists are sharing directly with the public what they do inside the lab. It’s like a window into the lab, or into the field,” said Wu. “Because it’s all public, students anywhere in the world that have access to internet are able to come to the website and see, ‘oh, this is what a paleontologist does, this is what a cancer biologist does.’”
When two University of Washington graduates launched one of the first crowd-funding sites for science, they had to beat the bushes for projects. A year later, so many researchers are beating on Microryza’s door that the startup born in Seattle is juggling a backlog of 500 proposals.
“What we’re seeing now is that the amount of funding available for research isn’t changing, but the amount of qualified researchers has more than doubled,” Cindy Wu, the co-founder of a science crowdfunding startup called Microryza, said in a phone interview with the International Business Times. “There are more and more ideas out there, and there isn’t enough money to support them.”
Some sites do not allow material rewards as they prioritize the purity of the process. Microryza, for one, encourages researchers to provide regular updates and at the research's conclusion they provide supporters with an electronic copy of the study if the campaign is 100% supported.
Cindy Wu and Denny Luan co-founded Microryza in Seattle after Wu had difficulty getting funds to support her undergraduate research project. "There are people who want to see research happen," Wu explains. "We connect donors directly to scientists."
One of the earliest projects to be fully backed via the site was by University of Washington bioengineer Herbert Sauro, who wanted to make electronic circuits to use when teaching genetics to high school students.
Dan Jaffe, a chemist at UW-Bothell, told Seattle Times columnist Danny Westneat that after he had trouble finding funding support to study the question -- "I got the sense through channels that nobody wanted to touch this" -- he listed his proposal on a science-based crowdfunding site, Microryza.
Atmospheric chemist Dan Jaffe’s proposal to monitor the trains reached its $18,000 “crowdfunding” goal Thursday, one day after a Seattle Times column about him and only a week after he first put up a request at science fundraising site Microryza.
Two former UW researchers started it last year after they became disillusioned with the way science is funded (or often, not). Can’t get your research backed by the usual government and corporate suspects? Then take it to the streets.
At the most basic level, science outreach can be defined as facilitating the understanding of science to non-scientists. While the overall objective of science outreach is clear, the ways in which engagement can occur are numerous. Traditional modes of sc
Ron Conway, David Lee, and Brian Pokorny meet new startup founders practically every day as investors at renowned angel funding firm SV Angel. So when they came backstage at this week’s Disrupt NYC event after their on-stage talk with Michael Arrington, I asked them to talk about the most inspiring up-and-coming founders they’ve met with lately — people who may be flying a little more under the radar than the Jack Dorseys of the tech scene at the moment, but could very well be the next big thing.
Denny Luan and Cindy Wu, Microryza: The former University of Washington researchers and recent graduates of tech incubator Y Combinator are building a new crowdfunding platform for scientific research at Microryza. Launched last year, the site has been de
A new crowdfunding platform site called Microryza has started funneling cash to dozens of high-risk scientific research programs, including a number of drug development efforts that would otherwise never see the light of day. Microryza's...
There was Microryza -- "Kickstarter for science;" Teespring -- "Kickstarter for T-shirts;" Watsi -- a non-profit aiming to leverage the crowd to finance individuals' medical care; Wefunder -- which wants to fund startups using the Kickstarter model; and B...
Whether you think the hype around its startups is justified or not, Y Combinator is still one of the most notable Silicon Valley startup incubators to watch. Its bi-annual demo days are important events for both startups and investors in the tech...
Research projects often require funding; funding researchers may or may not be able to get based on their degree or college and university affiliations. Enter Microryza, a new crowdfunding site specifically for research. The startup lets you create a pro
Inc. recently featured this so-called "Kickstarter for science," in a round-up of niche crowdfunding sites. Co-founders Cindy Wu and Denny Luan came up with the idea for Microryza when the pair, both 19 years old at the time, developed a treatment for Ant..
Microryza is democratizing scientific research. Microryza is a crowdfunding platform to follow and fund scientific research projects. On stage at Y Combiantor’s Demo Day, founder Cindy Wu said that funding for research projects is short-sighted and only a...
Microryza is a crowdfunding site for hard science research projects. While other sources exist for creative or other projects, sciences does not have an equivalent, the company says. Funders will get updates on the projects as it is progressing.
Platforms like Kickstarter and Indiegogo win hands down as the crowdfunding platforms that get the most attention and mind share of entrepreneurs and creative types. But they're not the only options out there--a slew of new, niche crowdfunding sites let t...
There’s a relatively new crowdfunding platform that debuted in April 2012 called Microryza, named for mycorrhizae, very minute, symbiotic fungi that live in plant roots. Interestingly these fungi are of vast importance to plants as they support not only a....
A Y Combinator-backed startup called Microryza is positioning itself as a “Kickstarter” for science research. The idea for Microryza sprouted when Cindy Wu, then an undergraduate at University of Washington, found that she had little hope of getting fundi
For the past six months, ten teams from the University of Washington’s Buerk Center for Entrepreneurship have been working within a Tech Stars-esque Jones Milestones/Foster Accelerator and building their startups. Now, they’re being rewarded for their eff...
Let us think of education as the means of developing our greatest abilities, because in each of us there is a private hope and dream which, fulfilled, can be translated into benefit for everyone and greater strength for our nation. -John F. Kennedy John F. Kennedy's quote about the goal of education could very well...
The first is Microryza, a crowdfunding platform for scientific research. I met founder Denny Luan in late 2011 at a Startup Weekend EDU event in Seattle where he pitched the idea and assembled a team that worked on this project. Microryza launched its bet...
Crowd-Funding for Science The explosion of social media has spawned the phenomenon of crowd-funding. Charities, rock bands, individuals—anyone—can raise funds from people all over the world via online sites such as Kickstarter and IndieGoGo...
Global recession has meant shrunken budgets.. And, despite strong economic arguments, scientific research has not been spared. Fortunately for some, such a change comes at a time when crowdfunding is all the rage.
“I like that [Myhrvold] said to embrace failure, which was reassuring,” said Denny Luan, founder of a crowd-funding website called Microryza, “because he definitely isn’t someone who you consider a failure.”
American scientists at the University of Washington in Seattle thought the public might well be up for that. In April, they set up Microryza, a website that allows scientists to pitch research projects which anyone could help fund. Co-founder Cindy Wu exp...
NECESSITY, so the proverb has it, is the mother of invention. And science is nothing if not inventive. So, as conventional sources of money get harder to tap (the success rate enjoyed by those applying for research grants from the National Institutes of H...
Microryza, a finalist that will be featured on stage at SIFP Seattle on October 18, 2012, has helped support a research group addressing a problem that is surprisingly prevalent. Greater than 400 million children worldwide are infected with intestinal rou...
Team GeekWire participated in the Geeks on a Train voyage between Seattle and Vancouver, B.C. as part of the GROW conference, taking place this week in Vancouver. We chatted with folks along the way, talking about a variety of topics. In this installment,
Microryza.com connects scientists with donors who can potentially fund their research. The Seattle-based staff screens proposed projects for feasibility and novelty and runs checks on applicants to prevent fraud.
Earlier this year, Denny Luan launched Microryza, a website that allows others to give money to research they care about. From bringing a triceratops to Seattle or developing Omnioff, a non-toxic alternative to Teflon non-stick cookware, the platform runs...
Some of the social enterprises to watch out of Seattle, that all have a for-profit arm but socially motivated goals, says Engh, include: Stockbox Grocers (getting local food to food deserts), Microryza (crowdfunding for science research), Island Wood (env...
Although Microryza's name is hard to pronounce, its platform aims to make it easy for users to back projects they're interested in. The tongue twister is the name of a new crowd-funding website, created by a group of UW students frustrated with the diffic...
This is a website that has real chance at changing the world and each of our lives. Perhaps you think I am exaggerating a bit, but let me assure you, I’m not. If you compare your life of that of your ancestors of just 100 years ago and the world of today
This is awesome. Launching today is Microryza, a Seattle-based firm that is taking the popular crowd-based fundraising model and is applying it to a critical component of the modern economy: scientific research. Yes, you just might be able to help fund yo...
Think of it like Kickstarter — just for hardcore science geeks. Microryza was started by Denny Luan and Cindy Wu, former University of Washington researchers who had grown frustrated with the bureaucratic and costly way in which many research efforts were
Entrepreneurship is something completely new and scary and unfamiliar to me, but entirely awesome. In the past month since winning the fast-pitch contest at the Ashoka Changemaker Luncheon, I’ve come face-to-face with some challenging realities: losing ex
November 21, 2011
Cindy applied to
Thanks for vouching for Cindy!
If you'd like to invest in Cindy, please open an account. We'll waive your fees if you do it now.
We help promising founders get off the ground with $20,000 and world-class mentors.
Wefunder supports three different federal laws that allow startups to raise money legally. To comply with the law, Wefunder Advisors LLC and Wefunder Portal LLC (both owned by Wefunder Inc) also list startups depending on the regulation used.
Legal May 16th 2016
Wefunder Portal LLC
for 223 startups
Wefunder Advisors LLC
for 98 startups
for 1 startup
Curious how well the companies have done? Or how many raised follow-on financing?
Some fine print: 1) These numbers include startups currently live on Wefunder if they pass their minimum target. 2) Some startups use two different laws at the same time (i.e., Regulation D and Regulation Crowdfunding).
Join 298,524 investors who funded 309 startups with over $110.5 million1
Wefunder Inc. runs wefunder.com and is the parent company of Wefunder Advisors LLC and Wefunder Portal LLC. Wefunder Advisors is an exempt reporting adviser that advises SPVs used in Reg D offerings. Wefunder Portal is a funding portal (CRD #283503) that operates sections of wefunder.com where some Reg Crowdfunding offerings are made.
Wefunder, Inc. operates sections of wefunder.com where some Reg A offerings are made. Wefunder, Inc. is not regulated as either a broker-dealer or funding portal and is not a member of FINRA.
You may also view our Privacy Notice.
Wefunder, Inc., Wefunder Advisors LLC, and Wefunder Portal
LLC do not review user-generated content beyond what's
required by US law. Some user-generated content, including investor
biographical information, may not be accurate.